The unfairness and injustice of Taiwan's exclusion from the United Nations system

The exclusion of Taiwan from the United Nations (UN) system remains one of the most contentious and significant injustices in contemporary history and global governance. Taiwan, a full-fledged democracy with a robust economy, particularly in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and semiconductor industries, has been systematically sidelined from international participation. This systemic exclusion is wholly attributed to China's heavy-handed repression and isolation strategy, grounded in the “One China” principle and reinforced by United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758. The principles of inclusiveness and universality in the UN Charter compel a reconsideration of Taiwan’s status and rightful place in the international community.

”One China” principle’s distorted narrative denying Taiwan’s sovereignty

The “One China” principle is a policy rooted in the claim that there is only one sovereign state under the name "China," which encompasses both mainland China (the People's Republic of China - PRC) and Taiwan (the Republic of China - ROC). The PRC, established in 1949 after the Chinese Civil War, insists that Taiwan is a part of its territory and has aggressively pursued its exclusion from international bodies. This stance starkly contrasts with Taiwan's evolving governance, which has developed into a thriving democracy, demonstrating a commitment to civil liberties, human rights, and the rule of law—principles that the UN ostensibly promotes.

The imposition of the “One China” principle has escalated into a bullying tactic, hindering diplomatic ties and limiting Taiwan's ability to engage in global affairs. The situation further intensified after UNGA Resolution 2758 was passed in 1971, which recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and expelled representatives of the ROC(Taiwan). This resolution has been interpreted by many as a blanket ban on Taiwan, effectively stifling its international presence and valuable contributions to global governance. This assertion is based on flawed legal assumptions and arguments.

China’s false remarks could threaten cross-strait stability and disrupt the international order. However, no distorted narrative that denies Taiwan’s sovereignty can change its political status.

Taiwan's contributions to global society

Despite its exclusion, Taiwan plays a pivotal role in various sectors critical to the global economy. With its advanced capabilities in semiconductor manufacturing—a sector crucial for modern electronics—Taiwan is frequently dubbed as the “Silicon Island.” The island's TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) supplies chips to major players in the global tech industry, enabling the functionality of devices ranging from smartphones to computers and automotive technologies.

The COVID-19 pandemic further underscored Taiwan's importance as a global healthcare innovator. Despite being isolated and faced with limited resources, Taiwan effectively managed its response to the pandemic, demonstrating a high level of public health capability and crisis management—factors that won global commendation. Taiwan's proactive measures included widespread testing, effective contact tracing, and transparent communication, making it a model for pandemic response.

Moreover, Taiwan is a vital player in global supply chains, particularly in the manufacturing and distribution of IT products essential for emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, 5G, and the Internet of Things (IoT). As countries worldwide increasingly reflect on their dependency on resilient supply chains, Taiwan’s strategic role becomes increasingly important in discussions surrounding technology and trade.

Human rights and democratic governance in Taiwan

Taiwan is a beacon of democracy in a region where authoritarianism still prevails. Unlike the PRC, with its tight reins on political dissent and freedom of expression, Taiwan boasts robust democratic institutions that allow for free elections, civil liberties, and the active participation of citizens in governance. The peaceful transfer of power in Taiwan, exemplified in several elections, stands in stark contrast to the repressive political atmosphere of the PRC, where dissent is met with heavy crackdowns on individual rights.

The principle of universality in international law suggests that all individuals have rights, and entities that embody these rights should be included in international dialogues. Taiwan's establishment of human rights as a core value, alongside its innovative approach toward societal welfare and inclusive growth, speaks volumes about its readiness to participate in UN mechanisms and contribute to the global human rights agenda. Excluding a democratic and progressive society from representation undermines the core UN principles of inclusiveness and universality.

The Detrimental impact of Taiwan's isolation

Taiwan's sustained exclusion from the UN system has grave implications. It denies Taiwanese citizens a voice in important global discussions on issues such as health, environmental sustainability, and human rights. The global community is deprived of Taiwan's expertise and insights that would enrich collective problem-solving efforts.

Furthermore, Taiwan's isolation extends beyond diplomatic exclusion. It creates psychological barriers that distort the perception of Taiwan’s legitimacy as a sovereign entity. This situation fosters instability not only for Taiwan but also for the surrounding region—heightening tensions between Taiwan and mainland China and complicating the security dynamics in East Asia.

A call for inclusive governance

Reevaluating Taiwan's exclusion from the UN requires a shift in dialogue focused on the principles of inclusiveness and universality. The UN was established to bring nations together, embodying the principles of peace, cooperation, and collective progress. Taiwan's exclusion contradicts these foundational ideals; hence, it is critical for member states to advocate for Taiwan’s involvement and contribution to global matters.

The application of UNGA Resolution 2758 must be revisited. While diplomatic intricacies surrounding this resolution are complex, it is imperative to understand that the changing international landscape necessitates flexibility and adaptation in how the UN acknowledges and interacts with global players like Taiwan. International actors, including supporting nations and international organizations, should engage in dialogue to foster an environment where Taiwan can participate meaningfully within the UN system.

Taiwan’s inclusion in the UN system benefits the international community

Taiwan's exclusion from the UN system represents a significant injustice predicated on political maneuvering rather than genuine representation of the will of the people. As a flourishing democracy and crucial player in global supply chains, Taiwan's contributions cannot be overlooked or dismissed. The principles of inclusiveness and universality in the UN charter call for its reinstatement in international dialogue.

To rectify this historical wrong and embrace a more equitable global governance system, there must be a collective effort to revise global attitudes toward Taiwan's participation in international platforms. The path toward justice and inclusion for Taiwan aligns closely with the foundational values championed by the United Nations, including peace, cooperation, and shared progress in facing the unprecedented challenges of our time. In a world that is increasingly demanding collaboration across borders, acknowledging and embracing Taiwan within the UN system is not only fair but necessary for the benefit of all.